The Leadership Signals You're Missing Before a Crisis Hits
- Audrey Blair
- Jul 24
- 5 min read

When the Squeaky Wheel Gets All Your Attention
Most leaders do not miss signals because they are careless. They miss them because everything is loud.
The urgent request.
The frustrated employee.
The process that keeps breaking.
The new tool everyone wants to implement.
The meeting that gets scheduled because nobody is quite sure what else to do.
I spoke with Hanna Bauer, founder of Heartnomics, about the leadership signals many organizations miss before things become a crisis. Hanna brings a unique lens to this conversation: lived experience with serious heart conditions, deep work in leadership development, and Lean Six Sigma expertise.
That combination leads to a powerful question for leaders: What if the problems you are reacting to are not the real problem? What if they are symptoms of something deeper in the system?
Prefer to Listen Instead?
You can listen to the full episode here:
Why Leaders Need a Baseline for Chaos
One of the themes Hanna comes back to is the importance of having a baseline.
If you do not know what "well" looks like inside your team, it becomes very hard to recognize when something is off. You may notice the loudest issue, but miss the quieter patterns underneath it.
That matters because leaders often get pulled toward the squeaky wheel.
The person who is upset.
The process that failed publicly.
The metric that suddenly dropped.
Those things may deserve attention, but they are not always the truest signal.
Sometimes the deeper signal looks like:
Teams that are always busy but rarely clear
People waiting for permission instead of making decisions
Feedback arriving too late to be useful
New technology being added to broken processes
Leaders trying to rescue everyone while running on empty
The signal is not always dramatic. Sometimes it is simply the repeated friction you have started to treat as normal.
Signal vs. Noise: Alignment Comes First
Hanna describes the work as internal alignment for external execution.
That line matters because leaders are constantly surrounded by options.
A new vendor.
A new tool.
A new system.
A new strategy.
A new opportunity that sounds compelling in the moment.
But if the organization is not clear on its purpose, identity, mission, vision, and values, every opportunity can look like a good one.
That is how leaders end up confusing movement with progress. They chase the latest input, react to the loudest pressure, and keep adding more to the system without asking whether the system itself is aligned.
Metrics matter. KPIs matter. But the deeper question is: What are those numbers actually helping you see?
If a metric is disconnected from purpose, it can become another source of noise. If it is connected to purpose, it becomes a signal leaders can actually use.
The Hidden Waste Leaders Often Miss
Because Hanna works with Lean Six Sigma principles, she brings the idea of waste into the leadership conversation. But this is not just about inefficiency on a spreadsheet.
It is about what gets drained from the system when friction goes unaddressed.
There is waste in overprocessing. Waste in unclear handoffs. Waste in unnecessary meetings. Waste in duplicated work. Waste in teams solving around broken processes instead of improving them.
But one of the biggest forms of waste is the loss of human potential.
That is the part leaders can miss because it does not always show up immediately. People may still be showing up. Work may still be getting done. The team may still be hitting some of the numbers.
But underneath that, energy is leaking.
People stop offering ideas. They stop taking smart risks. They stop believing that feedback will change anything. They start protecting themselves from the system instead of contributing fully to it.
That is not just a morale issue. It is a leadership signal.
New Systems Amplify What Already Exists
This conversation also turns toward AI and new technology, which is where many leaders are focused right now.
The temptation is understandable. A new system promises speed, efficiency, automation, and relief.
But Hanna makes an important point: new systems do not automatically fix existing problems. They often amplify what is already there.
If your processes are unclear, AI can make confusion move faster.
If your teams are siloed, new tools can deepen the disconnect.
If your culture lacks feedback, technology will not magically create trust.
Before leaders ask, "What tool should we use?" they may need to ask:
What problem are we actually trying to solve?
Where is friction already showing up?
What will this system amplify if we do nothing else?
Are our people ready for the change we are asking them to absorb?
The tool is not the strategy. The system around the tool matters just as much.
Why Resilience Has to Be Built Before the Crisis
One of the most practical parts of the episode is Hanna's point that resilience has to be developed before disruption hits.
Many leaders want resilient teams. But they do not always define what resilience looks like, measure it, or train for it.
That creates a gap.
Because asking people to be resilient without helping them build resilience is not leadership. It is pressure without preparation.
Resilience shows up in the ability to pause, adapt, recover, communicate, and keep moving with clarity under strain. But teams do not magically become adaptive in a crisis. They become adaptive because adaptability has already been practiced.
That means leaders need to build habits before they are urgently needed:
Timely feedback
Clear decision rights
Healthy delegation
Room to pause and review
Shared understanding of what "well" looks like
Stress reveals the system. It does not create every issue from scratch.
What Adaptive Teams Do Differently
Adaptive teams are not the teams where nothing goes wrong.
They are the teams that know how to respond when something does.
They have practiced delegation with both responsibility and authority. They receive feedback early enough to use it. They know the difference between a mistake that needs support and a pattern that needs correction.
They also have leaders who are present at the right moments.
Not present in every conversation. Not carrying every decision. Not rescuing every person from discomfort. But present where their leadership actually matters.
That is a different kind of leadership discipline.
Build in the Pause
Hanna offers one simple practice leaders can start with this week: build in the pause.
Not an indefinite delay. Not avoidance. Not another meeting because nobody wants to decide.
A real pause.
Time to review.
Time to notice.
Time to ask what the last experience actually taught you.
Hanna points to the idea that we do not learn simply by experience; we learn by reviewed experience.
That is where a lot of leadership growth happens.
After a tense meeting, a missed handoff, a failed rollout, or a moment of team friction, the question is not only "How do we move on?"
The better questions are:
What did this reveal?
What signal did we almost miss?
Where did we react instead of respond?
What would resilience look like here next time?
What support, clarity, or structure is missing?
That pause is not wasted time. It is where leaders stop treating symptoms and start understanding the system.
A Final Thought
Leadership signals are not always loud. Sometimes they are hidden in the patterns everyone has gotten used to.
The meeting that always reopens the same issue.
The person who stopped speaking up.
The process that needs constant workaround.
The leader who cannot rest because everything depends on them.
If you only respond to what is loud, you will keep chasing symptoms.
But if you learn to notice the signal underneath the noise, you can lead earlier, cleaner, and with more care.
That is the work.
Ready to Build More Resilient Leadership Systems?
If this conversation resonates, listen to the full episode of Change Is Hard with Hanna Bauer.
You can also learn more about Hanna's work at Heartnomics.com, connect with her on LinkedIn, or explore her resources for leaders who want to turn team friction into traction.




Comments